Coulomb's Law(last edited May 13, 2013) |
|
|
Dr. Larry Bortner |
|
Learning ObjectivesDescribe the concepts of a torsion balance. State how the charge deposited on a metallic sphere depends on the charging voltage. State how the magnitude of the force between two charges at a given separation depends on the values of the charges. State how the magnitude of the force between two constant charges depends on the distance between them. Purpose |
|
|
To investigate and verify Coulomb’s Law that quantitatively describes the force between two point charges. |
|
Background |
|
What Affects the Force Between Two Charges? |
|
|
At this time in your academic endeavors, you are probably quite aware that there are two types of electric charges, positive and negative. (No, we’re not going to count the electric bill as a charge here.)
Like charges repel each other and opposites attract.
To be true scientists, we should discover this experimentally, but this is one of those things that is sort of universally known, so we’ll accept it as fact.
Aside from the polarity of the charges, what other single quantity might possibly affect the force between these two things? Let’s make a list: 1. How much charge one of the charges has. 2. How much charge the other has. 3. The mass of one of the charges. 4. The mass of the other. 5. The shape of one of the charges. 6. The shape of the other. 7. The distance between the charges. You may have thought of one or two other things but let’s concentrate on these items.
To simplify matters, let’s assume point charges. This eliminates items 5 and 6. Next we’ll assume that any gravitational force is too small to worry about, so that gets rid of items 3 and 4. This leaves us with the charge amounts and the distance between them. Your task is to experimentally determine how the force between two charges is affected by these quantities. Since this experiment has already been done before, initially by Charles Augustin de Coulomb back in 1785, you are being asked to verify Coulomb’s Law: the force F between two point charges q1 and q2 separated by a distance R is given by |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
where Coulomb’s
constant k = 8.988 x 109 N |
|
|
|
|
Measuring Small Forces |
|
|
Because keeping many, many charges of the same polarity right next to each other for any reasonable time is difficult, we work with small amounts of charge. This means the force between two charges is weight-of-a-mosquito tiny. How exactly do you measure this force? With a tiny scale, of course! Well, not really, but sort of. A torsion balance is used, where the force is proportional to how far a wire twists instead of how far a spring is stretched. In an extension of Hooke’s Law, a measure of the angle twisted from equilibrium gives a measure of the force: |
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
where K is a constant specific to the wire. There are two different kay constants in this experiment, this constant and Coulomb’s constant (a lower case k). Be sure to keep them separate in your mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
The torsion balance that we use in the experiment is the PASCO Coulomb Balance (Figure 1). A conductive sphere ST is mounted on a rod, counterbalanced, and suspended from a thin torsion wire. An identical sphere SM is mounted on a slide assembly so it can be positioned at various distances from ST. (A charged sphere acts like a point charge most of the time. Exceptions are dealt with below.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Diagram of the full Coulomb Balance assembly. |
|
|
To find the force, both spheres are charged, and the sphere on the slide assembly is placed at a fixed distance from the equilibrium position of the suspended sphere. The electrostatic repulsion between the spheres causes the torsion wire to twist. The experimenter then twists the torsion wire to bring the balance back to its equilibrium position. From Eq. (2), the angle through which the torsion wire must be twisted to reestablish equilibrium is directly proportional to the electrostatic force between the spheres. |
|
Charge Production |
|
|
We could set up a patch of carpet for you to shuffle along to generate a charge that you could transfer to each sphere. (You did wear your sneaks today, right?). Alas, quantifying such a charge is problematic. A better, repeatable way of providing a charge is to use a voltage source. When a charging probe connected to this source touches an electrically isolated metallic sphere, a charge q is deposited. This charge is proportional to the voltage V: |
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
where C is a yet another constant (at least it’s not K). The SI unit for voltage is a volt (V) and the unit for charge is a coulomb (C). The unit of voltage of the source used in the experiment is a kilovolt (kV). |
|
Angle Correction |
|
|
The spherical shape is used for the charge holder because it acts like a point charge when the charge is evenly distributed across the surface. In other words, the force of this charge on other charges is as if all the charge were concentrated at the center of the sphere. Unfortunately, the charge does not always spread evenly around the sphere. When two spheres of the same charge are brought close to each other, some of the charges on the near side slide over to the opposite side due to the repellant nature of the electric force. There is a higher density of charge on each sphere’s opposite side compared to the near side. You can account for this redistribution by dividing the measured angle θ by a geometric factor (Look! Another constant!): |
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
where a equals the radius of the spheres and R is the separation between sphere centers. So the angle required to calculate the force correctly is |
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Experiment Outline |
|
|
We have identified three independent variables that we need to see how the dependent variable (the force) changes. This means three experiments are necessary, in each case changing one variable while keeping the other two constant (the control variables) to see how the force changes. We can cut that down to two experiments if we assume that the two charges are symmetric. It doesn’t matter which of the two charges are varied, you expect the same force between two no matter which charge is on which ball. The experiments to conduct are these: one to probe the charge dependence of the force, the other to look at the distance dependence. |
|
|
|
|
Static Electricity Tips and Considerations |
|
|
Experiments with the Coulomb Balance are straightforward
and can be accurate as well as frustrating. A charged shirt sleeve, a draft
or breeze, somebody walking by a little too quickly, an excessively humid day |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedure |
|
|
You need the following items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Record the given values of K and C, along with explanations of what they are. |
|
|
2. Measure and record the diameter of the sphere on the sliding assembly. Include your estimated uncertainty. (Assume that the spheres are the same size.) Take at least two readings at different spots. The calipers give you a reading to the nearest hundredth of a millimeter; the metal balls may not be spherical to this precision. |
|
Force Dependence on Charge |
|
|
3.
Move
the sliding sphere as far as possible from the suspended sphere, R |
|
|
4. Ground yourself (touch the metal end of the grounded probe) and the spheres (contact them with the grounded probe). |
|
|
a. Set the torsion dial to 0° (Fig. 2). |
|
|
b. Zero the torsion balance by appropriately rotating the bottom torsion wire retainer until the pendulum assembly is at its zero displacement position as indicated by the index marks (Figs. 2 and 3). See note above about the torsion pendulum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. Side view of Coulomb Balance. |
|
Figure 2. Photo showing torsion dial. |
|
|
5. Use a voltage of VT = 2.50 kV to charge ST. (Review Figure 1 to distinguish between spheres ST and SM.) |
|
|
a. Charge SM with a voltage of VM = 0.50 kV. |
|
|
b. Move SM to a position of R = 8.0 cm. |
|
|
c. Adjust the torsion knob as necessary to bring the pendulum back to the zero position. Record the angle θ required to do this. |
|
|
6. Repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 (except for 4b) for the following VM in kV, in this order: 1.00, 1.50, 2.00, 2.50, 3.00, 3.50, 4.00, 4.50, 5.00, 4.50, 4.00, 3.50, 3.00, 2.50, 2.00, 1.50, 1.00, 0.50. |
|
|
a. Include VM = 0.00 and θ = 0 as data points. |
|
|
b. These are the minimum number of points. More points are better. If an angle doesn’t seem right, retake the data.
|
|
|
|
|
Force Dependence on Distance |
|
|
7. Repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 (except for 4b) for VT = VM = 5.00 kV and for the following R in cm: 20.0, 17.0, 14.0, 12.0, 10.0, 9.0, 8.0, 7.0, 6.0, 5.0.
|
|
Additional Data |
|
|
8. Repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 (except for 4b) for VT = VM = 4.50 kV and for R = 7.0, 6.0, and 5.0 cm. |
|
|
9. Repeat steps 3, 4, and 5 (except for 4b) for VT = VM = 4.00 kV and for R = 5.0 cm. |
|
Analysis |
|
|
1. Start a Coulomb’s Law spreadsheet from the Second Semester selection of Templates in the Start Up menu. |
|
|
2. Enter known values. |
|
Force Dependence on Charge |
|
|
3. Calculate the radius a of a sphere. |
|
|
4. In labeled columns enter your values of VM and VT in kV, R in cm, and θ in degrees for your first set of data, a constant sphere separation distance with one varying charge. |
|
|
5. For each of your data points, calculate the labeled quantities in the appropriate column. |
|
|
6. The plot of F vs. qM, with error bars is automatic, with a linear trendline. Does the data fall on or close to this line? |
|
Force Dependence on Distance |
|
|
7. Repeat Steps 4−5 for your second set of data, where the charges were held constant and the distance varied. 8. Again the plot with error bars, this time of F vs. R, is automatic. But this graph has three trendlines, a line, a polynomial of order four, and a power law. Which is the best fit? a. In least squares fits, the R2 value is a measure of how good the fit is. The closer to one, the better the fit. Which of the three functions is the best fit? b. What an Excel Trendline (a least squares fit) gives is the best function of that type that fits the given data. In Physics Lab, we need to go a step further. And use our intuition. In this case, what do we expect the force to be for very large or very small values of R? As R gets smaller and smaller (approaches zero), do we expect the force to get larger, smaller, or stay the same? As R gets larger and larger (approaches infinity), do we expect the force to get larger, smaller, or stay the same? c. Using physical intuition, which is the better fit?
|
|
Challenge: Finding Coulomb’s Constant |
|
|
9. Repeat Steps 4−5 for all your data combined. 10. Again the plot with error bars is automatic. This is a graph of F vs. qM qT /R2. We have assumed that the results of your two experiments were that the force depended linearly on the product of the charges and on the inverse square of the distance. |
|
|
11. Do a linear least squares fit to find the
experimental value of k and its uncertainty in μN·cm |
|
|
12. Convert the accepted value of |
|
Questions |
|
|
1. Show a Sample Calculation of one of your values of u{qM}. |
|
|
2.
Propagate the uncertainty for |
|