Quantum Physics

 

27.1 Blackbody Radiation & Planck

 

1900  Major Unsolved Problems re Light:

 

SOFTWARE: QuickTime 6.5.1
DATE: 2004:05:19 19:28:21
HOST: Mac OS X 10.3.3

Why do hot gases emit spectral lines, with different sets of  for each?

 

 

 

Why does the spectrum of a blackbody (or other incandescent source) disagree with that predicted by electromagnetic theory?

 

“ultraviolet catastrophe”

 

Predicted

Observed

 

 

1900  Max Planck  Light emitted by resonators, each capable of emitting only at discrete (quantized) energies:

 

 

n is a quantum number, and h is Planck’s Constant.

 

27.2 The Photoelectric Effect & Particle Theory of Light

Put negative V on E:

No light  no current

More light  more current

 

Put positive V on E:

Some current if V not too negative  the stopping potential , where no electrons have enough energy to cross from E to C.

 

Even if , no light emitted unless  

 independent of intensity, so  independent of intensity!

 

 proportional to the frequency of light hitting E!

 

All of the “things” on the right would imply that the energy of light is not determined by the intensity, but by the frequency.

 

1905  Einstein  Light behaves like a particle whose energy  - “photons”. When interacting with matter, the exchange in energy is an “all-or-nothing” proposition.

 

 

The maximum KE of the photoelectron is  

 

Cutoff wavelength:

 

 

 

   Contradicts the Wave Model of Light

Explained by the particle Model of Light

 

No electrons are emitted if the incident light falls below some cutoff frequency  that is characteristic of the material being illuminated. This is inconsistent with wave theory, which predicts that the photoelectric effect should occur at any frequency, provided the light intensity is sufficiently high.

 

The effect is not observed below a certain cutoff frequency follows from the fact that the photon energy must be greater than or equal to . If the energy of the incoming photon does not satisfy this condition, the electrons are never ejected, regardless of light intensity.

 

The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectrons is independent of the light intensity. According to wave theory, light of higher intensity should carry more energy into the metal per unit time and therefore eject photoelectrons having higher kinetic energy.

 

That  is independent of the light intensity can be understood with the following argument. If the light intensity is doubled, the number of photons is doubled, which doubles the number of photoelectrons emitted. However, their maximum kinetic energy, which equals , depend only on the light frequency and work function, not on the light intensity

 

The maximum kinetic energy of the photoelectron increases with increasing light frequency. The wave theory predicts no relationship between photoelectron energy and incident light frequency.

 

That  increases with increasing frequency is easily understood if  as stipulated by the particle theory.

 

Electrons are emitted from the surface almost instantaneously (less than 10-9 sec after the surface is illuminated), even at low light intensities. Classically, we expect the photoelectrons to require some time to absorb the incident radiation before they acquire enough kinetic energy to escape from the metal.

 

That the electrons are emitted almost instantaneously is consistent with the particle theory of light, in which the incident energy arrives at the surface in small spatial packets and there is a one-to-one interaction between photons and photoelectrons. In this interaction, the photons energy is imparted to an electron that then has enough energy to leave the metal. This is in contrast to the wave theory, in which the incident energy is distributed uniformly over a large area of the metal surface.

Example: Problem #12

Electrons are ejected from a metallic surface with speeds ranging up to 4.6 x 105 m/s when light with a wavelength of  = 625 nm is used. (a) What is the work function of the surface? (b) What is the cutoff frequency for this surface?

27.3 X-Rays

 

X-rays are produced in most settings by accelerating electrons to hit a target using a strong voltage. The emitted spectrum consists of lines and a continuum. The lines are due to electron transitions in the inner parts of the atom, while the continuum is due to bremsstrahlung.

 

 

 

 

The maximum energy that can be liberated as light is the KE of the electron when it strikes the cathode:

 

Example: Problem #20

Calculate the minimum wavelength x-ray that can be produced when a target is struck by an electron that has been accelerated through a potential difference of (a) 15.0 kV, (b) 100 kV.

 

27.4 Diffraction of X-Rays by Crystals

 

We have seen how a 2-dimensional diffraction grating can produce interference patterns in light waves. X-rays can penetrate into many materials, so that a regular 3-dimensional structure can produce similar interference patterns.

 

X-rays scattering through a crystal can constructively interfere, producing bright spots.

Constructive interference (here shown in the case of reflection) occurs when

 

 

X-ray diffraction of the DNA molecule was the crucial piece of evidence for the determination of the helical structure of DNA by F.H.C. Crick and J.D. Watson in 1953, for which they received the Nobel Prize. The diffraction work was done by Rosalind Franklin in 1952, whose precise and careful work was barely acknowledged by Crick & Watson (and their competitor Wilkinson).

 

Example: Problem #22

A monochromatic x-ray beam is incident on a NaCl crystal surface where d = 0.353 nm. The second-order maximum in the reflected beam is found when the angle between the incident beam and the surface is 20.5°. Determine the wavelength of the x-rays.

 

27.6 Photons & EM waves

 

Light behaves both as a wave and as a particle. Which aspect you see depends on the situation.

 

High Energy  a single photon produces an easily measurable effect  particle aspect. Example: X-rays

 

Low Energy  a single photon has too little energy to produce an easily measurable effect  only detect large numbers  wave aspect. Example: Radio waves.

Physicists think of photons as a wave packets or wavicles, which carry both wave and particle aspects.

 

27.7 Wave Properties of Particles

 

1924  Louis de Broglie suggests that the wave-particle duality of photons might extend to all matter particles. Suppose electrons, protons, and other particles with mass also behaved as photons did, where

 

 

Then we could, in principle, define a wavelength of a matter particle as  and its frequency as . At the time de Broglie suggested the idea, there wasn’t a shred of evidence to support it. However, in 1927 Davisson & Germer (quite by accident) measured Bragg diffraction of electrons scattering off of crystalline nickel. The effect has since been observed for other particles as well.

 

Example: Problem #36

Through what potential difference would an electron have to be accelerated from rest to give it a de Broglie wavelength of 1.0 x 1010 m?

 

Example: Problem #41

The resolving power of a microscope is proportional to the wavelength used. A resolution of approximately 1.0 x 1011 m (0.010 nm) would be required in order to “see” an atom. (a) If electrons were used (electron microscope), what minimum kinetic energy would be required for the electrons? (b) If photons were used, what minimum photon energy would be needed to obtain 1.0 x 1011 m resolution?

 

27.8 The Wave Function

 

1926  Erwin Schrödinger develops  the wave equation that govern how matter waves work. This is the fundamental development for modern quantum mechanics (QM), also called wave mechanics. It is QMs equivalent of Newton’s Laws of Mechanics.

 

The basic “animal” of QM is the wave function . It’s essentially the amplitude of the matter wave. Here, a particle is not located at a specific place  it is “fuzzy” in the sense that we cannot predict its location exactly ahead of time. The likelihood  probability  of finding the particle at a specific place is related to the square of the wave function . (For those of you familiar with complex numbers, it is actually then product of the wave function with its complex conjugate  ).

 

QM is all about solving for what  is in different situations. If you go here you can see a simple case of a “particle in a box”. Look at the wave function, and the probability distribution.

 

27.9 The Uncertainty Principle  Heisenberg (1927)

 

If a measurement of position of a particle is made with precision  and a simultaneous measurement of linear momentum is made with precision , then the product of the two uncertainties can never be smaller than .

 

 

 


One can get a “feel” for this by considering the following experiment:

 

When you try to measure the position of an electron by “seeing it” using a photon, when the photon scatters off the electron, it alters the momentum of the electron (and its position)! It can change by as much as the photon’s momentum . The precision in  cannot be better than the photon’s wavelength  (remember diffraction, etc.). So the product must look something like  

 

 

 

 

A really careful calculations gets the equation with the  in it.

 

Is it the act of making the measurement or the intrinsic fuzziness of the wave functions of matter that really causes this limitation? This is the sort of thought that physicists have argued about for years!

 

Example: Problem #46

(a) Show that the kinetic energy of a nonrelativistic particle can be written in terms of its momentum as KE = p2/2m. (b) Use the results of (a) to find the minimum kinetic energy of a proton confined within a nucleus having a diameter of 1.0 x 1015 m.

 

27.10 Scanning Tunneling Microscope (reading exercise for the student) Short version:

 

Electrons can cross an insulating (vacuum) barrier by a QM process called “tunneling”. Essentially, the  of the electrons extends over the barrier a little bit, decreasing as .

 

The exponential dependence makes the current between sample and probe very sensitive to the heights of the irregularities on the surface of the sample.